File of sorts.

Not exactly the proverbial round file, but I have resorted to NFRY's or QCON's where often the T'wain shall meet.  Stop.

1. Not fully read yet.
2. Quick comment on news.
4. wane
3. tan gent
a. b. c. d. (...) thru ?
a2 Dark Matter, Anti-Matter (...) r2
a3 Mitt's BO*Son , d3 Bring It On!

The point being, that there is reading between the lines and there is lede or ship.

1.g Try Lemmings, j Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!, m ANN,  h2 Clinton(Bill) is full of B.S.
2. Lemon Ship

Then there is (sc)[scroll/or/click] of share 'n angle or* lemon plank.
A, Breaking Trojan Goat* Leaks B.Fight On!, C, D Leaking Intelligence, E. Odyssey Dawn, F. Seconds, G. Roger That "V"
* of/or

Mean while ...
3. a. Future Bubble?, b. Skipping Geometry, c. Un-Hyper Links, d. Bricks and stones, e. Unspinning Charlotte!,

...Rubi'O's** Cube? Oops, I mean Walker's run.

** OW

[ThinkProgress,  OurFuture.Com ]

That's Politics...

or it's political.*

GOP Code*** for "Get out of the Frackin' Kitchen!"

[Segue Post-read see asterisk**.]

More True Man Shows, and the real man.

Catching the heat?(see ***)

Truman: "If you don't like the heat, get out of the kitchen".

Framing the Kitchen:

With my lemon twist on it:

If it's a choice between a genuine Moderate, and a Moderate in Republican clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Democrat before they will a phony Moderate(update 10-11-2011), and I don't want any phony Moderate candidates in this campaign.

Note: Regarding the lemon twist, Ctr F "sinking ship".

Before I parse the C-rap out of this... here is a scary BS.(blog search)

* Joan Walsh, back from vacation & Ground Hogs Day.

(I have barely cracked the cook book in Salon, but ran with my earlier thoughts.)

** Having now read "it's political", I find where I had heard Joan(see *)

*** the Code they need to get

[Also Politics; Foreign Policy & Economics in balance.(from rational images)]

[And here is the Un-Wrap of the G'Ribble of the cost all [!]

Lemon Ship

Friday evening I used the sinking ship metaphor in a conversation[*].  It is more accurately the lemon (twist) ship, definitely in need of work. 

[*]8-26-13 Or lemonade plank metaphor ? Talking about mixed metaphors. (FP1)
Walking the plank plays into the dynamic evolution.  As a party wanes out of power, less partisan or more pragmatic(some may read opportunistic) members leave to dilute the partisanship of the new ship and leave a more concentrated sunken ship.  As I have now expanded the sort here are more to (un-b.s.) or blog search:
 mangled mixed meta for  ... or 3M.
1.  A. The honeymoon is over?, B. Ditto Heads Unite!
2.  A. Obtusity? , B.The Read C? C. Oh Sasha!  D. Independent comment
3**.  A. The Read C?  B., C., D., E., F. The History of B.S. , G. What the Beck?
M-bed Ed Pun
**oar 4M(see meta for)

[NOW and AM : The Thin Red Line and Chris*** Hill ?]
***
[UN-Common $ense or $Cents? Breaking Email: Frank Rich]
{pre-The Cycle-seg way}{*}
[In order too... parody wrap ... sounds familiar.]
{*}links added 8-27-13

Obtusity?

Not Here.(Kay label added)
Nor Here.
But in context the former Here is the proper angler.

In a less embedded aside, Leonard Pitts Jr. hits the nail on the head of American Exceptionalism.

In another arena, a friend noted how trustworthy FOX and Bill O'Reilly are. Well, 28% and 9% are far from a margin of victory unless you are looking for an American Icon. NBC, MSNBC, CBS, and ABC combine for 29% while CNN's Cooper and Blitzer match O'Reilly's 9%, and the a4mentioned other network's hosts(Matthews, Brokaw, Couric and Sawyer tied) combine for 12%. So it is only in the winner[*] take all, not knowing what it takes world, where follow the leader matters. Now that is a real Laffer Curveball! Or is it?

[Then there is Pawlenty of problems. Bottom line: if money is a maker then tax it as much as labor. That is an inverse paradox or maybe praximoron.]
[The bottom line is obliquity with intent.]
[Sub** Text]

** asterisks apply to that link, but is not the missing link, but does fit the leadership narrative over people.
[*] boo yeah! Stewart boosts O'Reilly's ratings(**), which likely rigs poll. i.e. maybe FOX viewers are more fair and balanced when the left is presented.
(**) I don't have the Nielsen ratings but it might be reflected in the poll.
[Footnote: scroll over some links for some understanding, but unfortunately links that may need clicking on do not last forever. Hence I hope to be less obtuse but no less oblique in the future. There should be no joy in mud-ville, as the outcome of the NY26th shows, as divided meta(for) prevails. But to unembed these analogies, the Ryan plan was the issue in the divide to lose in New York, 48% takes it, while the issue will next be before the U.S. Senate with Democrats in the majority and Republicans faced with laying their votes on the line. Some will leave the sinking ship, diluting the lemonade. If I may make a few Truman references it is not a direct analogy, but hanging their votes on their necks will be like dividing to conquer.]
[Meanwhile Up-Date]
[Speaking of not Truman--something about:

If it's a choice between a genuine Republican, and a Republican in Democratic clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Republican before they will a phony Democrat, and I don't want any phony Democratic candidates in this campaign.

With my lemon twist on it:

If it's a choice between a genuine Moderate, and a Moderate in Republican clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Democrat before they will a phony Moderate(update 10-11-2011), and I don't want any phony Moderate candidates in this campaign.

OK, it loses a little bit of it's zest, but that is the nature of the slippery-slope, trickle down, lemonade, mudville.]

[Update 12-8-11 The Last Word? As it seemed to line up.]

Update: Fight On!

Fight On!
Pun on Thom!

Meanwhile, Updates are not logged in:
Corporate Profiling?
Is it the Lorenz Lens?

4-11-12 SCOTUS update.

Develop(ed) image to include:

Physics, Psychology, Philosophy, and with Politics at the center, or top, depending on how***you spin it.

Preemptive Veep? MoJo. (Ouch) No I don't think that the host of Morning Joe may be a Republican Veep Candidate, but it might be a good suggestion. What I mean by MoJo is that they may pick a Joe Biden like* candidate. Of course that might be too broad a generalization, I mean someone with legislative experience, of which Paul Ryan, Rick Santorum, or Newt Gingrich might fit, but I mean an other-than-Romney type. But who am I to endorse** a Republican?

* not that I believe in ideological contrast.

** with a lemon twist

*** Righteous Tangent [!]

P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)

Lemon or Orange?

Or Green*? Why vote?
Ralph Nader asks: Why say yes to the party of no? The answer is, one shouldn't.

*"At the risk of being obvious..." began my letter to the editor, but I guess I went underboard.

Horsey's cartoon goes overboard on voters
At the risk of being obvious, I would like to comment on David Horsey's "Red & Blue America" (May 19). For the sake of humor, it went overboard in its characterizations of those who voted for George W. Bush or Al Gore. I hope it is a good thing if people realize, like I did, how we can see one side funnier or less overboard than the other.
I hope the humor can be less dividing than the colors pinned on Gore and Bush. It also made me realize that there may be value in using more colors, but somehow without Green or any other color being a factor in making us see red.**
[Please note the bold "Green or any other" was struck by the editor, apparently not obvious enough that Nader was the Green party, (and green)the almighty buck and envy. And these days if you need a Tea Party pallet, just smear the colors and brown with hints of purple works nicely.]

** if you want more anger and debt don't vote
[Speaking of info wars]

FOOTNOTES PAGE TWO AUGUST 2013

8-1-13:"up date"(sc)(b.s.)(1)Connecting the Dots(sc), Culture War (2)(a), Way, Too Point Oh?(sc), Noble, No Bell, Nobel(sc), Congress- - to boldly go..., Everything is on the Table!.

8-5-13:  (b.s.) a.Pun it?, b.Trilemmas and Cultural Calculus, c.Enough Smirking!, d.Dark Matter, Anti-Matter, e. Careful Consideration , f. , g. , h. Con Fluence... , i.Knot Even , j., k.Carpe Diem!, l.Certain Sources..., m. , N .by Stiob?!?, o., P.Middle C? , Q. / [T-Row Price?]

8-9-13 (37) "dealing with" (MSNBC "All IN" & Thomas Roberts) (P.S. re:Bromance)

8-20-13 Boatload of FP needed.  4. a C Sick? , b , c , d , e , f , G , h , i Square This!  j , k , 5. a, b, c by Stiob?!? - 6. a, b() Nailed It! T-point Oh! , c CU T-party, d , e , f, g , h Square This! , ... q Tea Party Down Grade

8-21-13 Miranda Lefts? 1. a. b. c. d.  /   2.  A. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j.
8-22-13: FC /  changey thing to reads.
8-26-13 Lemon Ship may be the best name for the dynamic metaphor as I sort out how it has evolved.  Does it stem from partisan ship?  But it does refer to concentrates and dilutions.
8-27-13 Knot so Out of the Blue? 
8-28-13: A Black and White Chat, that is the ticket.(FP3)

Sept. (*)/?

[Saved in Draft 9-3-13]
Ctrl F time+machine
Not so relevant (b.s.):
Marco... , TBA, Triumph of the process (breaking), Moment of Truth...
Sept. 3rd. AM

[segue]
The Time-Machine reference points to the irony of comparisons with earlier could/a, should/a, heckuva jobs. Also in lieu of ongoing diplomacy as to Syria.  Secretary Kerry, Hagel and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dempsey are testifying at this time.

9-4-13 (*) is ultimately about timing of "No Bama O Drama" and his toss to Congress and the world.
We are all in the same box...NOW[!](Jeremy Bash)
TheLiaisonReport Timeline:
Leveling the World Stage? (9-1-13)
Buy In or Sell Out (8-29,30-13)
Kobayashi Maru (8-27-13)
Lemon Ship (8-25,26-13)
No Sarcasm Font! (6-14-13)
Red Line? (5-9-13)
PC of Mini-Me (4-30-13)
Truth Tellers (5-16-07)

Knitty Gritty

Schell Lacking ?*

*:  Who shells, C sells, at the she soar [?]

[Not to un-mbed!]
(oar) a. Divide to conquer?, b., c. The Read C?, d. Knitty Gritty , e. Ghosh Darn , f. Not that I am fixed... , g. The Fourth Dimention of Twain , h. Reigning Wags and Tales. , i. Lemon Ship , j. Dark Matter, Anti-Matter ,  k. Fn 4 point Oh June 2013! , l., m. See Pact, n.(b~ch), o. Footnote: interesting digs, p.Etch-A-Sketch 2.0 , q. Alter Under Construction
(ofor): A. Irony versus Hypocrisy, B. Weak End Update: Fun'n Edifying, C. Anticipation Project ^ , D.TGIF (two) , E. Lean Forward File , F. The Way Fourth?, G. Coin-age of the day. , H. GRN , I. Post-Pyth , J., K. "Feel the Love"? , L. The %th EleFont , M. Two Wrongs Make a Right? , N. Throwing the Game , O. N-oddly Enough... ,  P. Ideology , Q. The Bully... , R. Unprincipled ,  S. Vast Mainstream Conspiracy (VMC) , T. Realmiffication , U. HEAR HEAR! V. ENTERNEWSMEANT TODAY (and tomorrow) W. Forward (Ironically) ...

Tan Gents?
Lab L's?
A., B. Amidst the Pile and Piling On., C., d. Leaking Diplomacy, e. Executing (the) Constitution, f.Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)**, g.Plausible Disciplination[?],  h. i.Questions on Vetting?, j. Hiding Behind the Straw Argument.
We 3 Kings? O W ?

Footnotes Page4 August 2013

8-5-13 [?]: (s.c.) a.  Fiddle Sticks^ , b., c., d. e., f. Moos Room /?
A for August need to ReVamp Heading {see brackets next}

{8-9-13} The Oh Gen Duh?(b.s.) a.(Brackets and the Debt Clock), b., c.(The Curve or Nuance Thing), d.(Woof Woof?), e. Two Evils? Or flippin flop?, f., g., h.Game+Lock, i., J. Trouble with the Curve?  { ! )

8-22-13  Teddy Bull and Pit Bull @ UOB: U- A.Connecting the Dots, B, C,  D.No Teddy[!], The Straw Bear / B-. A., b.Connecting the Dots, C. /// Tool Shed- A.Inconvenient , B., The Real B. S. of the F. C., Nail Meet F--C---[!], E.Irony versus Hypocrisy

8-26-13: Lemon Ship *** Pun on Aster Risks (To Ctrl F Initialism) A. Conservative Foray (4A) B. Initialism, C. Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)** , D.Child's Play   

8-28-13 A Black and White Chat is not about colors or races, but spectrums, polarities(knot exactly), and dimentions.

Independent comment

Senatory Patty Murray and former state legilsatore Dino Rossi have held two debates of which I have heard more comment on than snippets. I could relate to the charge that the questions may have not been answered directly even though I fancy that I may have undestood one more than the other and if you think it is simple then that is the side that might be wrong. This is the perpsective I take from what has been exchanged in the ad campaigns. So if you haven't seen the debates keep that in mind, not that I am independent. My point is that there is a need to counter the so-called facts that come out as well as answer questions, while some of the answers are just plain incomplete. My reference to independent comment above refers to close to neutrality here but sympathy with one frustrated with the party representatives(or rather only a choice between the two), who incidentally was a libertarian with socialist understanding. I won't parse that but at least the individual had great scepticism for the so-called tea partiers, even though I find a libertarian socialist to be even more idealist if not a fantasy. On the other hand, while some want their cake and eat it too, there seems some extremity of balance(if not irony) in this combination.
[Cross Reference to be inserted but it has to do with fuzzy math and fuzzy language.]
[For those who think that they have to know better to vote, vote anyway*, at least there is a shot at cancelling a vote of someone that does not know better enough not to vote.]
* in some races the first link was neutral or gave dual endorsements, rely on this one and then the other to fill in if any questions.
[If the choice is between a Democrat or a Republican and that is usually it**, vote the Democrat as they can be counted on to be more flexible than the Republican. The time to influence them by sending a message was in the primary.]
** technically it is not the rule but the result that it still happens that way even though concievably the top-two could be of the same party, the political calculus or lemonade making does not work out that way, and third parties are even more in a pickle(I mean lemon.)

FOOTNOTES PAGE AUGUST 2013

Up Date: That's the ticket. 

8-2-13 The blank's the thing. A. Proxymoron?, # That is the ticket!, #?.(FP5) x. Killing Fields of Dreams, (y) Tea Party Down Grade, z. Congress- - to boldly go... ? 
8-2-13 1., 2. a., b., c., d(a), e.(We are at the table. ), f.(Update), g.House of Cards, h.  3. a. b.Killer Ad from Killer Group c.Take On The Hill! d. e.Post-Pyth F. G. h.I'm not saying... i. j. k. l. m. n. o. Just Say O! 4.MessAge 5.(Dime) a. Mmmm MOW, MOW, b.Tin Foil Herman, c. R.S.V.P.

8-4-13 VC, Vinyl Café, Vicious Cycle Virtuous Correction? Pun on VC or Victimizer Congress.
Perception Correction President(shall) Congress(shun)all?
8-5-13 : CePR? math/baker? Perception $knot Reality!

8-9-13 WAR (belated insert) Presently listening to Norman Goldman opening re: Rance Priebus and the Middle East. (5)mess+I-uh(b.s.), (7) format change, (13){Paper U?}, (21) NO!, (37) ! 

8-20-13 Back from Sekiu fishing trip, with dad, cousins, nephew and friends.
8-20-13 (a) [Aeschylus] & how buried

8-21-13 1 wiki(Miranda Warning), 2 (WSJ), 3 Trans Parent Seas, 4 Miranda Warning!, 5 The Guardian, 6 The Telegraph, 7 The Guardian(check redundancy)   Re: Oldsmobile (b.s.)

8-22-13:  That old hope and changey thing [!] (order of insert)  6 2 3 4 1 5 [7]
    (changey old hope and thing That [!]) Ribble this ? (FP2) 
8-23-13 bold added: not to Farce the Wor(l)d or parse SS oar well.
8-26-13: The (b.s.) of lemon ship is already inserted, with later untwist of mangled mixed meta for ... ?(FP2)
8-27-13 Not to pun on Too Bolds or W lines. (1 NOW, 2 The Cycle)
8-28-13 Hecuva post. (wMd?) Crtl F "spectrum" (a, b, g, i) See notes on original post and placement /timing of asterisks and links.  There is an M-bed within this FP.  But to cut the dimentionalism, there is more work. (d, w)